03-23-2016, 09:37 PM
(This post was last modified: 03-23-2016, 09:38 PM by HeadHoncho.)
I proposed two formats in the other thread.
A: 1, 8, 9 (18 points, less is better)
B: 2, 7, 10 (19)
C: 3, 5, 12 (20)
D: 4, 6, 11 (21)
A: 1, 8, 10 (19)
B: 2, 6, 11 (19)
C: 3, 5, 12 (20)
D: 4, 7, 9 (20)
I think for Warlords, when people often want a completely anonymous game with teams not known in advance, the latter set without clustering is better.
With that said, is C unfairly disadvantaged for picking last? Should we tweak that? Maybe make the teams with picks 11 and 12 the "19" point teams?
A: 1, 8, 9 (18 points, less is better)
B: 2, 7, 10 (19)
C: 3, 5, 12 (20)
D: 4, 6, 11 (21)
A: 1, 8, 10 (19)
B: 2, 6, 11 (19)
C: 3, 5, 12 (20)
D: 4, 7, 9 (20)
I think for Warlords, when people often want a completely anonymous game with teams not known in advance, the latter set without clustering is better.
With that said, is C unfairly disadvantaged for picking last? Should we tweak that? Maybe make the teams with picks 11 and 12 the "19" point teams?