Nature
Follow This Easy Process To Get Started Playing Alamaze
Step #1 - Register for Forum Account      Step #2 - Create New Player Account      Step #3 - Sign In  (to issue turn orders and join games)
ATTENTION: After Creating Player Account and Signing In, select the GAME QUEUE link in the Order System screen to Create or Join games.
Alamaze Website                 Search Forum              Contact Support@Alamaze.net


Player Aids             Rulebook             Spellbook             Help Guides             Kingdom Set-Ups             Kingdom Abbreviations             Valhalla             Discord

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Exploits
#41
(01-17-2017, 02:35 PM)VballMichael Wrote: 320 by itself is not the abuse. 320 plus ensuing 150 repeat is the abuse. No village would keep doing that. But how stop the abuse without a correction?

Why do you have to reply after I want to stop talking about this

still a lazy fix.   When it was changed to get a maximum of veteran from a village.  Not a lazy fix logical and thought out.   Removing the ability completely when there are so many other ligitamate uses for it lazy fix.   You could make it so your own emmies go home when you attack like other players emmies.  Could make it not possible to 320 the same PC you issued an attack order the same turn.   Something completely different but thought out and not just reacted to.
Reply

#42
(01-17-2017, 02:34 AM)Ry Vor Wrote: I wonder what other aspect of life you can casually second guess the decisions of the people that make the coffee, so to speak.  At some point, it won't be worth the negativity.  There will always be Starweb for you.  One minute to learn, 30 seconds to do a turn.  No confusion on what can be done.  You can play a game over the course of six months with about 30 minutes total of your attention.  Go ahead and try it.  

Alamaze isn't for everyone.

Except.....coffee isn't what is at issue, here, so you're grinding the wrong bean, here, Rick.

Alamaze isn't for everyone. Well, at least that gives me something to report on for future issues of the magazine. One can never have too much material to report on, I suppose.

It seems to me that the ultimate goal is one shared by the disputing parties. Just saying, "Alamaze isn't for everyone" is like waving a wand of ipse dixit, and just as unpersuasive. Deleting the posting doesn't make the "Alamaze isn't for everyone" bit more persuasive, either.

For that matter, no game is for everyone. Saying it doesn't alter the underlying equation. You love Alamaze. He loves Alamaze. Not that Rick Loomis probably wouldn't appreciate you recommending Starweb to the guy, but the criticism that he offered up was pretty mild. You're overworked. You need a vacation. It would be better than quarreling with your customers.

What you want is for people to love your game. But that's just it - He DOES love your game! Yet, you want him to go and play Starweb, a game that is over forty years old, and of which you have offered up criticism at various times down through the years?

Hell, Rick, it was through criticism that you and I came to know one another and became friends. Your game isn't any the worse off, just because this guy or a thousand guys criticize something about it, your company, or your customer service. Overall, you've got a pretty decent game product. It is continually evolving - or at least, it has been in recent years. There's always bugs and kinks and assorted minutiae to work out. There likely always will be - particularly in anything continuing to evolve and to be improved upon.

The two of you should shake hands and shake it all off. Passion matters as much in making arguments as it does in designing games. That doesn't mean that there has to be a falling out, though.

I came by, today, to update your forum software, and to try and figure out what I needed to do to sign up for a game of Alamaze, and here you are, telling people that Alamaze isn't for everyone, and to go play Starweb.

If nothing else, you have bad timing, Rick.

We return you, now, to your regularly scheduled programming.
Reply

#43
Tongue 
Media.   Tongue
Reply

#44
(01-17-2017, 03:58 PM)The Jumpingfist Wrote:
(01-17-2017, 02:35 PM)VballMichael Wrote: 320 by itself is not the abuse. 320 plus ensuing 150 repeat is the abuse. No village would keep doing that. But how stop the abuse without a correction?

Why do you have to reply after I want to stop talking about this

still a lazy fix.   When it was changed to get a maximum of veteran from a village.  Not a lazy fix logical and thought out.   Removing the ability completely when there are so many other ligitamate uses for it lazy fix.   You could make it so your own emmies go home when you attack like other players emmies.  Could make it not possible to 320 the same PC you issued an attack order the same turn.   Something completely different but thought out and not just reacted to.

Once again JF you turn it personal and rude. If you don't want to talk, don't post.
Reply

#45
(01-17-2017, 06:53 PM)VballMichael Wrote:
(01-17-2017, 03:58 PM)The Jumpingfist Wrote:
(01-17-2017, 02:35 PM)VballMichael Wrote: 320 by itself is not the abuse. 320 plus ensuing 150 repeat is the abuse. No village would keep doing that. But how stop the abuse without a correction?

Why do you have to reply after I want to stop talking about this

still a lazy fix.   When it was changed to get a maximum of veteran from a village.  Not a lazy fix logical and thought out.   Removing the ability completely when there are so many other ligitamate uses for it lazy fix.   You could make it so your own emmies go home when you attack like other players emmies.  Could make it not possible to 320 the same PC you issued an attack order the same turn.   Something completely different but thought out and not just reacted to.

Once again JF you turn it personal and rude. If you don't want to talk, don't post.

I had already make your point in my original post.   I am sorry if I made you feel like I was getting to personal and rude.   I will do my best to not reply to your posts and would appreciate if you do the same.
Reply

#46
(01-17-2017, 06:45 PM)Ry Vor Wrote: Media.   Tongue

Hahahahahahaha!

That should be media with a small "m," though. In fairness, though, we operate on a tight budget.
Reply

#47
Effective Immediately (as of Jan 24 2017)

The following exploit has been corrected and now applies for all games:
  • The wraithform spell (# 870) and lich spell (# 871) may only be cast at the wizard's natural level. In other words, use the wizard's level before it is boosted by artifacts like the Ring of Spells or Ring of Power (which both increase a wizard's level by one).
I apologize if this isn't enough of time to adjust your actions for an upcoming turn but these exploits have to be fixed immediately or current games may become further unbalanced if they continue.

Press your browser refresh button to pick up the latest order entry validation code.
Reply

#48
UM - I like this change, with it can you adjust the 799 and 801 to only count natural level rather than adjusted by ring level. Otherwise it seems out of whack.

Thanks,

Atuan
Reply

#49
(01-24-2017, 04:40 PM)Atuan Wrote: UM - I like this change, with it can you adjust the 799 and 801 to only count natural level rather than adjusted by ring level.  Otherwise it seems out of whack.

Thanks,

Atuan

Magic research (order #799) and the Stone of All Minds (order #801) are already using the wizard's natural level (without boost by artifact).
Reply

#50
(01-24-2017, 04:40 PM)Atuan Wrote: UM - I like this change, with it can you adjust the 799 and 801 to only count natural level rather than adjusted by ring level.  Otherwise it seems out of whack.

Thanks,

Atuan

Last time I checked this the Game aleady does this but the order checker does not check for it.   Also it raises the wizard based on natural Level as far as checking for max kingdom level allowed.
Reply



Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 Melroy van den Berg.