Login

**IMPERIAL_TARK** · 08-11-2018, 03:56 AM

I will play!

**Avantar** · 08-11-2018, 10:24 AM

I am in

**Calidor** · 08-11-2018, 01:53 PM

Ok. We have 7 so far. Need 5 more.

Any thoughts on drafting?

08-11-2018, 04:13 PM

(08-11-2018, 02:08 AM)PTRILEY Wrote:
(08-11-2018, 12:46 AM)Acererak Wrote: I think we need 12. Let's get a good ole game going. The way the scenario is intended. 10 regions, 2 dispersed. Forum only communication?

I like it... also no NAP’s and only the max allowable ally declaration.?

I'm up for no NAP, but that doesn't mean you can't agree not to attack each other publicly. I think it's the long term game wide NAP that Rick for example is always discouraging. So maybe limited NAP? It's Calidor's game so probably up to him.

08-11-2018, 04:14 PM

(08-11-2018, 01:53 PM)Calidor Wrote: Ok. We have 7 so far. Need 5 more.

Any thoughts on drafting?

My thought would be random with chivalry.

**Calidor** · 08-11-2018, 07:05 PM

(08-11-2018, 04:13 PM)Acererak Wrote:
(08-11-2018, 02:08 AM)PTRILEY Wrote:
(08-11-2018, 12:46 AM)Acererak Wrote: I think we need 12. Let's get a good ole game going. The way the scenario is intended. 10 regions, 2 dispersed. Forum only communication?

I like it... also no NAP’s and only the max allowable ally declaration.?

I'm up for no NAP, but that doesn't mean you can't agree not to attack each other publicly. I think it's the long term game wide NAP that Rick for example is always discouraging. So maybe limited NAP? It's Calidor's game so probably up to him.

I'm mostly interested in just having some kind of communication as silent games are driving me nuts. By the same token, we don't want it to turn into a group vs group as everyone NAPs up (that's what team games are for). So maybe just have allies, public communication, and try to have a fun game.

Open to any ideas though. I want everyone to have fun.

**Calidor** · 08-11-2018, 07:11 PM

So far we have:

CALIDOR
PTRILEY
DUPONT
ACERERAK
MAD HATTER
IMPERIAL TARK
AVANTAR

Need 5 more!

**Drogo** · 08-13-2018, 03:18 PM

Would communication be limited to every third turn as proposed in the initial email?

I would consider playing. I generally don't play games with any communication because it requires more time per turn and it seems like those who communicate the most will have a great advantage.

**Calidor** · 08-13-2018, 04:37 PM

(08-13-2018, 03:18 PM)Drogo Wrote: Would communication be limited to every third turn as proposed in the initial email?

I would consider playing. I generally don't play games with any communication because it requires more time per turn and it seems like those who communicate the most will have a great advantage.

I'd prefer that but not a deal breaker for me.

**Strongwill** · 08-13-2018, 05:34 PM

(08-13-2018, 04:37 PM)Calidor Wrote:
(08-13-2018, 03:18 PM)Drogo Wrote: Would communication be limited to every third turn as proposed in the initial email?

I would consider playing. I generally don't play games with any communication because it requires more time per turn and it seems like those who communicate the most will have a great advantage.

I'd prefer that but not a deal breaker for me.

Not a deal breaker for me either..