Posts: 8
Threads: 2
Joined: May 2013
Reputation:
0
So what I am getting out of this thread is everyone agrees that there is no real way dragons can investigate an unusual sighting and the idea of that is craptacular. General consensus right?
Posts: 685
Threads: 44
Joined: Apr 2013
Reputation:
3
No. I enjoy sightings, but I don't feel like I'm missing out on them playing the BL right now.
On the other hand, if the BL and RD were free to zoom around gobbling up artifacts, I think we'd have a lot more complaints than this thread is seeing.
Posts: 367
Threads: 27
Joined: Mar 2013
Reputation:
13
When Phil was running the game he made the change to allow the Dragons to investigate unusual encounters. This was the way the game was played for years and years. I want to say for well over ten years.
From a game balance point of view I don't see the need for this restriction.
From a lore standpoint perhaps, but then how does one explain Dragon emissary and agents?
Unusual encounters are a large part of the game and include far more than weapon artifacts. For example two encounters can produce a p-2 wizard, which is the only way to gain a wizard besides ESO.
Restrict the type of artifacts the Dragons can use perhaps, but no need IMHO to prevent them from investigating encounters all together.
Posts: 45
Threads: 2
Joined: Aug 2012
Reputation:
0
how about create different versions of the games, and allow players to choose which version they want to play?
ultimately, the most fun in Alamaze is in epic games of two players (or two teams), with each side picking kingdom, in this case, it does not matter whether changes are made or not.
Posts: 186
Threads: 13
Joined: Aug 2013
Reputation:
0
My concern with Dragons able 2 get artifacts is any artifact out of their grasp since their troops are so strong? A US should be a littke taxing to get not a sure thing