Follow This Easy Process To Get Started Playing Alamaze
Step #1 - Register for Forum Account
Step #2 - Create New Player Account
Step #3 - Sign In (to issue turn orders and join games) ATTENTION: After Creating Player Account and Signing In, select the GAME QUEUE link in the Order System screen to Create or Join games.
Please do not take any of my comments as a personal insult or as a criticism of the game 'Alamaze', which I very much enjoy. Rather, I hope that my personal insight and unique perspective may, in some way, help make 'Alamaze' more fun, a more successful financial venture, or simply more sustainable as a long-term project. Anyone who reads this post should feel completely free to ignore, disregard, scorn, implement, improve, dispute, or otherwise comment upon its content.
(08-28-2014, 06:42 PM)Lord Diamond Wrote: Game Details
I wanted to add a few comments on this thread because I think this Primeval format was a lot of fun.
This was a custom anonymous primeval game with the Kingdoms Darkelven, Dwarven, Ranger, Elven, and Gnome.
We played with 5 extra orders and 5 groups.
Although the Ranger Kingdom won the contest with 4 regions both the Dwarf and Gnome had 3 regions under control at earlier points in the game.
The Darkelven had the advantage against the Ranger early in the game taking Synisvania on turn 6 and holding both regions 6 and 9 versus the Ranger in region 10 after that.
I think the Dwarf created problems for the Darkelf after that allowing the Ranger to get back into the game and eventually capture regions 6, 8, 9 and 10 for the victory.
I liked the fact that we had 5 balanced kingdoms in play. But I think substituting the Warlock for the Darkelven may result in a better starting game board for the future.
I would encourage players to try a game like this.
I think a fun variant would also be WI, WA, SO, AN ,DE. If that version goes to turn 24 I think the victory should go to the kingdom with the most artifacts.
I am curious about why only 3 kingdoms were on the HC.
Lord Diamond
Please do not take any of my comments as a personal insult or as a criticism of the game 'Alamaze', which I very much enjoy. Rather, I hope that my personal insight and unique perspective may, in some way, help make 'Alamaze' more fun, a more successful financial venture, or simply more sustainable as a long-term project. Anyone who reads this post should feel completely free to ignore, disregard, scorn, implement, improve, dispute, or otherwise comment upon its content.
(09-01-2014, 12:16 AM)Lord Diamond Wrote: I am curious about why only 3 kingdoms were on the HC.
players held skeletons until turn 24 because it looked like the champion would be decided on points.
Hawk,
That sir, is incorrect. I bribed both the DA and DW prisoner with my agents on turn 23, both learning a skeleton. I released the skeletons strategically on the last turn (turn 24) though in the end I still finished 4th. Nonetheless, I enjoyed taking one last stab...;-)
(09-01-2014, 12:16 AM)Lord Diamond Wrote: I am curious about why only 3 kingdoms were on the HC.
players held skeletons until turn 24 because it looked like the champion would be decided on points.
Hawk,
That sir, is incorrect. I bribed both the DA and DW prisoner with my agents on turn 23, both learning a skeleton. I released the skeletons strategically on the last turn (turn 24) though in the end I still finished 4th. Nonetheless, I enjoyed taking one last stab...;-)
(09-01-2014, 12:16 AM)Lord Diamond Wrote: I am curious about why only 3 kingdoms were on the HC.
players held skeletons until turn 24 because it looked like the champion would be decided on points.
Hawk,
That sir, is incorrect. I bribed both the DA and DW prisoner with my agents on turn 23, both learning a skeleton. I released the skeletons strategically on the last turn (turn 24) though in the end I still finished 4th. Nonetheless, I enjoyed taking one last stab...;-)
Marty B.
aka Destitute Noble
This is a lie. DA cannot be bribed the way that a smelly DW can. It was torture, I assure you. Of course, that is the proper way.
09-02-2014, 12:22 AM (This post was last modified: 09-02-2014, 12:23 AM by Stillgard.)
(08-31-2014, 08:26 PM)Hawk_ Wrote:
(08-28-2014, 06:42 PM)Lord Diamond Wrote: Game Details
I wanted to add a few comments on this thread because I think this Primeval format was a lot of fun.
This was a custom anonymous primeval game with the Kingdoms Darkelven, Dwarven, Ranger, Elven, and Gnome.
We played with 5 extra orders and 5 groups.
Although the Ranger Kingdom won the contest with 4 regions both the Dwarf and Gnome had 3 regions under control at earlier points in the game.
The Darkelven had the advantage against the Ranger early in the game taking Synisvania on turn 6 and holding both regions 6 and 9 versus the Ranger in region 10 after that.
I think the Dwarf created problems for the Darkelf after that allowing the Ranger to get back into the game and eventually capture regions 6, 8, 9 and 10 for the victory.
I liked the fact that we had 5 balanced kingdoms in play. But I think substituting the Warlock for the Darkelven may result in a better starting game board for the future.
I would encourage players to try a game like this.
I think a fun variant would also be WI, WA, SO, AN ,DE. If that version goes to turn 24 I think the victory should go to the kingdom with the most artifacts.
I would like to add that I did cause trouble with the DA, but it was very mutual. He invaded 5 just after I took it. I then went hard after 6 to make him defend it, only to find the Ranger there. I still don't understand why the DA didn't stay in 9 early on. I also spent almost the whole game defending myself in region 2 from the Elf only to see the Gnome make a late push there too.
Stillgard
105 Dwarf King
116 Dark Elf Vampire
122 Mighty Troll Tyrant
134 Enlightened Sorcerer
139 Dwarf King
09-02-2014, 02:31 AM (This post was last modified: 09-02-2014, 02:33 AM by Hawk_.)
(09-02-2014, 12:22 AM)Stillgard Wrote:
(08-31-2014, 08:26 PM)Hawk_ Wrote:
(08-28-2014, 06:42 PM)Lord Diamond Wrote: Game Details
I wanted to add a few comments on this thread because I think this Primeval format was a lot of fun.
This was a custom anonymous primeval game with the Kingdoms Darkelven, Dwarven, Ranger, Elven, and Gnome.
We played with 5 extra orders and 5 groups.
Although the Ranger Kingdom won the contest with 4 regions both the Dwarf and Gnome had 3 regions under control at earlier points in the game.
The Darkelven had the advantage against the Ranger early in the game taking Synisvania on turn 6 and holding both regions 6 and 9 versus the Ranger in region 10 after that.
I think the Dwarf created problems for the Darkelf after that allowing the Ranger to get back into the game and eventually capture regions 6, 8, 9 and 10 for the victory.
I liked the fact that we had 5 balanced kingdoms in play. But I think substituting the Warlock for the Darkelven may result in a better starting game board for the future.
I would encourage players to try a game like this.
I think a fun variant would also be WI, WA, SO, AN ,DE. If that version goes to turn 24 I think the victory should go to the kingdom with the most artifacts.
I would like to add that I did cause trouble with the DA, but it was very mutual. He invaded 5 just after I took it. I then went hard after 6 to make him defend it, only to find the Ranger there. I still don't understand why the DA didn't stay in 9 early on. I also spent almost the whole game defending myself in region 2 from the Elf only to see the Gnome make a late push there too.
As the RA I actually tried to take region 9 on turn 3. I had probably 40% of the region along with the City. However, I got my power 1 wizard killed by chance on turn 2 when I attacked a DA group with the 1RA. This group was sitting at a friendly neutral town with a defense of 10710 with no wizard to cast 171.
Additionally the 2RA had a power 1 wizard but it landed on a neutral town with a defense of 15115 and my PC value was too small at 8560.
I figured I would just take region 9 over the next couple of turns but then the DA emmy invaders showed up just as I moved the RA emmies out of my controlled PC's into the neutral ones in region 10.
I spent the next several turns waging a military war in R9 until I luckily won it back by force. I was able use my full resources from R10 while the DA was facing winter in R6 so we were on fairly even footing financially.
(DA) I was content fighting the RA but then thought since the DW and GN each had three regions I would prevent a DW victory and hope the RA would do the same against the GN. But the RA then invaded 6. I guess he made the right decision. Maybe in the future I will continue to pummel my opponent without any regard as to who else might win. I will say that the DA was my last choice when kingdoms were being assigned. It was an excellent anonymous contest. All my opponents are high on my list of players I like to game with.