Nature
Follow This Easy Process To Get Started Playing Alamaze
Step #1 - Register for Forum Account      Step #2 - Create New Player Account      Step #3 - Sign In  (to issue turn orders and join games)
ATTENTION: After Creating Player Account and Signing In, select the GAME QUEUE link in the Order System screen to Create or Join games.
Alamaze Website                 Search Forum              Contact Support@Alamaze.net


Player Aids             Rulebook             Spellbook             Help Guides             Kingdom Set-Ups             Kingdom Abbreviations             Valhalla             Discord

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
"True" Classic Interest?
#31
I do like the idea of a True "Classic" version for nostalgic fans. Given the time and effort invested by the EE team to breath life back into it, I would think that it should be an option for all of those players who come back and want a crack at the RD or the DE. After all, most of us here joined for that very reason Wink
Reply

#32
I do wonder if the term classic should be listed differently.  To me, a classic game does not have the DE/AN or GN but does have PA,WE,NO,BA,UR,HA and SW.
Reply

#33
(04-08-2015, 01:34 AM)Rogal Wrote: I do wonder if the term classic should be listed differently.  To me, a classic game does not have the DE/AN or GN but does have PA,WE,NO,BA,UR,HA and SW.

Good point. Perhaps classic 2nd cycle then?
Reply

#34
I have not seen 12 players wanting to play the pre-2013 version of the game yet. If Rick does decide to revive it...looks like it would be all Titan games with a few Warlord games scattered here and there.
The Frost Lord,
Centurion in the Military War College
Pioneer of Alamaze
Reply

#35
(04-08-2015, 01:34 AM)URogal Wrote: I do wonder if the term classic should be listed differently.  To me, a classic game does not have the DE/AN or GN but does have PA,WE,NO,BA,UR,HA and SW.

Well, that would be Classic First Cycle. 
 Lord Diamond

Please do not take any of my comments as a personal insult or as a criticism of the game 'Alamaze', which I very much enjoy. Rather, I hope that my personal insight and unique perspective may, in some way, help make 'Alamaze' more fun, a more successful financial venture, or simply more sustainable as a long-term project. Anyone who reads this post should feel completely free to ignore, disregard, scorn, implement, improve, dispute, or otherwise comment upon its content.





Reply

#36
(04-08-2015, 01:50 AM)Frost Lord Wrote: I have not seen 12 players wanting to play the pre-2013 version of the game yet.  If Rick does decide to revive it...looks like it would be all Titan games with a few Warlord games scattered here and there.

It's a "complete package" question more than anything.

I like a number of aspects and elements of the pre-2013 game better than the current version.

But I also like (and have always liked from the beginning) quite a few of the new changes and enhancements.

And I LOVE the order checker and new format.

So for the sake of rolling back the complete package in a binary yes-or-no question, do I want to go back to the Clipper platform and make work for Cipher and the team?

Absolutely not!

Would I love to roll back some specific rules and changes?  Absolutely.  But I don't feel strongly enough about those specific rules and changes to throw out the baby with the bathwater.
Reply

#37
I'd play games with the classic Kingdoms (1st Cycle) and the classic map even.
Reply



Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 Melroy van den Berg.