Posts: 819
Threads: 42
Joined: Jul 2012
Reputation:
0
11-11-2013, 02:14 AM
(This post was last modified: 11-11-2013, 02:51 AM by Lord Thanatos.)
I have conceded to Head Honcho in our first Titan match.
He has agreed to a rematch and he suggested the following drafting criteria:
P1 selects
P2 selects
P2 selects kingdom for P1
P1 selects kingdom for P2
P1 selects
P2 selects
P2 selects kingdom for P1
P1 selects kingdom for P2
P1 selects
P2 selects
P2 selects kingdom for P1
P1 selects kingdom for P2
Nobody can select UN for other player and nobody can select for the other player a natural enemy of a kingdom he already controls.
With the above in mind, I select (I lost and elected to pick first with the above restrictions) . . .
The GIANT kingdom!
Now you select your kingdom and a kingdom for me (cannot be UN or WI).
Lord Thanatos
Posts: 1,968
Threads: 71
Joined: Jun 2013
Reputation:
6
I'm actually rethinking this... the concept I really like, but help me think this out. Is there ANY benefit to going second in this proposal?
Posts: 1,968
Threads: 71
Joined: Jun 2013
Reputation:
6
11-11-2013, 06:55 AM
(This post was last modified: 11-11-2013, 02:08 PM by HeadHoncho.)
I certainly don't mind giving you a benefit, in choosing whether to go first or second. I think it just behooves us to make the concept as fair as possible for future contests.
I'm not sure picking second in a standard contest is a big advantage, by the way. Ideally, any draft system should be close enough to parity to allow for comparable results and preferences.
Here, the second player always picks second for the three Kingdoms s/he gets to keep. There is a further handicap in that s/he gets saddled with the last Kingdom of the four worst remaining.
Maybe the middle bracket should be swapped? So:
P1 selects
P2 selects
P2 selects for P1
P2 selects for P1
P2 selects
P1 selects
P1 selects for P2
P1 selects for P2
P1 selects
P2 selects
P2 selects for P1
P1 selects for P2
Is that better structurally? Would that make it a tougher choice, in terms of what you think is the better order?
EDIT: Or we could do:
P1 selects
P2 selects
P2 selects
P1 selects
P2 selects for P1
P1 selects for P2
P1 selects for P2
P2 selects for P1
P1 selects
P2 selects
P2 selects for P1
P1 selects for P2
Again, just talking it out with you since this is a new concept. Thanks for your patience.
Posts: 819
Threads: 42
Joined: Jul 2012
Reputation:
0
I very much like the idea of making selections for the other player. I also like your restrictions that no player may select the UN for the other player nor select for the other player a natural enemy of a kingdom already assigned to that player.
Let's move the selections for the opponent higher in the draft so we don't have a point where there is no kingdom remaining that satisfies the restrictions.
After we are done selecting for our opponent, then we reverse the selection order so that P2 selects first. We have also afforded P2 the opportunity to select first for his opponent. Is this more fair?
P1 selects
P2 selects
P2 selects kingdom for P1
P1 selects kingdom for P2
P2 selects kingdom for P1
P1 selects kingdom for P2
P2 selects kingdom for P1
P1 selects kingdom for P2
P2 selects
P1 selects
P2 selects
P1 selects
If this is acceptable, I will select first: GIANT.
You now select your kingdom plus a kingdom for me....
Lord Thanatos
Posts: 1,968
Threads: 71
Joined: Jun 2013
Reputation:
6
11-11-2013, 05:09 PM
(This post was last modified: 11-11-2013, 05:45 PM by HeadHoncho.)
Works for me! Thanks for talking it out, I think this is better.
I select AN.
For you, I select SO.
EDIT: LordThanatos
GI
SO
HeadHoncho
AN
LT is up, and can't select DE for me.
Posts: 1,968
Threads: 71
Joined: Jun 2013
Reputation:
6
I select DW for LT.
LT:
GI
SO
DW
HH:
AN
TR
LT can't select DE or RA for me.