Buddy/Ignore List
02-18-2017, 12:13 AM
(This post was last modified: 02-18-2017, 12:15 AM by Thunderb0lt.)
My dearest Red DRagon,
The position of the Darkelf was stated on day 1. It was a simple and reasonable request to share the council to benefit all. You did not state opposition to it. You simply reacted with threats of war after turn 4. Your total disregard for all of the other kingdoms in this game in that regard cannot be overlooked by any of us. Yet i have to wonder. Since we have seen almost no diplomacy whatsover from the Elf or Sorceror, is it because they are not intent on the game itself? Is it because they fear the wrath of the RD? Is it because they are hoping for war between our kingdoms so that they will have a chance to buildup knowing that both your kingdom and mine may both be weakened because of it? The same actually goes for the Underworld. It is a strategy within itself to not acknowledge a dispute and to offer services to either opposing kingdom when they themselves can also benefit from it.
We propose that the other kingdoms on the map do indeed hope for an early war between the RD and DA. And their strategy is sound if that is the case because although your nation may best the DA in military efforts, we both know there are many other weapons in our arsenal that can hurt you as well. Since no kingdom appears be sharing my concern, then we offer this suggestion to put this issue behind us. Why do we not simply share the HC? The DA and the RD? We will not vote NAY if the RD allows us the next 2 issues and from that point on we can take turns with our HC issues. This is also fair and not unreasonable and neither kingdom becomes distracted by what we perceive to be an 'emotional' issue.
That is our proposal that would benefit rather than harm our two kingdoms and made with all due respect to the RD King.
The position of the Darkelf was stated on day 1. It was a simple and reasonable request to share the council to benefit all. You did not state opposition to it. You simply reacted with threats of war after turn 4. Your total disregard for all of the other kingdoms in this game in that regard cannot be overlooked by any of us. Yet i have to wonder. Since we have seen almost no diplomacy whatsover from the Elf or Sorceror, is it because they are not intent on the game itself? Is it because they fear the wrath of the RD? Is it because they are hoping for war between our kingdoms so that they will have a chance to buildup knowing that both your kingdom and mine may both be weakened because of it? The same actually goes for the Underworld. It is a strategy within itself to not acknowledge a dispute and to offer services to either opposing kingdom when they themselves can also benefit from it.
We propose that the other kingdoms on the map do indeed hope for an early war between the RD and DA. And their strategy is sound if that is the case because although your nation may best the DA in military efforts, we both know there are many other weapons in our arsenal that can hurt you as well. Since no kingdom appears be sharing my concern, then we offer this suggestion to put this issue behind us. Why do we not simply share the HC? The DA and the RD? We will not vote NAY if the RD allows us the next 2 issues and from that point on we can take turns with our HC issues. This is also fair and not unreasonable and neither kingdom becomes distracted by what we perceive to be an 'emotional' issue.
That is our proposal that would benefit rather than harm our two kingdoms and made with all due respect to the RD King.