Login

Thalion · 06-29-2013, 07:58 PM

Hmmm, yes I had to go back and read our correspondence. I don't think the surprise attack was in the spirit of our agreement, and the emissary movement certainly against the agreement...

**Kalrex** · 06-30-2013, 02:45 AM

He has a patrol sitting in ZZ breaking my agreement with him as well... it's how he rolls Wink

**Lord Diamond** · 06-30-2013, 02:50 AM

(06-29-2013, 07:58 PM)Thalion Wrote: Hmmm, yes I had to go back and read our correspondence. I don't think the surprise attack was in the spirit of our agreement, and the emissary movement certainly against the agreement...

We had no agreement. I emailed you at least twice asking if you wanted a long term treaty and you ignored both emails. That was early in the game. I assumed that you didn't reply because you were saving me as a possible expansion path.

The only real correspondence was when you showed up at my town, I asked you if you were attacking me, and you said that you thought my town was in your region and left.

I will email your our correspondence to refresh your memory. In the interest of fairness, I would appreciate your acknowledgement here.

**Lord Diamond** · (This post was last modified: 06-30-2013, 03:22 PM by Lord Diamond.)

(06-30-2013, 02:45 AM)Kalrex Wrote: He has a patrol sitting in ZZ breaking my agreement with him as well... it's how he rolls

Kalrex,

What agreement am I breaking with you? We have a NAP. That means that I won’t attack you. Period. I haven’t attacked you with emissaries, groups, or agents. I have fulfilled, to the letter, our Non-Aggression-Pact. Let’s talk about that for a minute.

I have been allied with the Black Dragon since the beginning of the game. You agreed to NAP with me approximately one turn before you attacked my declared ally. The only reason you wanted to NAP with me was so that you could attack my ally without fear that I would move to defend him. When I asked you not to attack the Black Dragon, you made a big point of the fact that the NAP was between you and I.

As soon as we had that NAP, you proceeded to mock me behind that wall. “If it weren’t for the NAP, I would crush you within three turns”. “Lord Diamond thinks he is so much better a player than he really is”. The list goes on and on. That’s the “spirit” of the NAP that you keep talking about. The “spirit” you speak of is that you want to be able to do whatever you want while the rest of us should bow to your vast experience. It doesn’t work that way.

I take my alliances very seriously. I may not be able to attack you, but I can sure as hell help my ally all I wish.

**Kalrex** · 06-30-2013, 07:54 PM

Umm, OK.

**Kalrex** · 06-30-2013, 07:58 PM

I like how you thought you were being clever by the way Wink

**Lord Diamond** · 06-30-2013, 08:08 PM

(06-30-2013, 07:58 PM)Kalrex Wrote: I like how you thought you were being clever by the way

You mean like how clever you were by locking me in a NAP thinking it would prevent me from helping my ally, your intended victim? You know, the one that you attacked so that he was fighting 4:1? You don't hear him whining about it, although we all know you would be crying a river in his position.

Win the game and you can brag about how clever you are. In the meantime, prove yourself.

**Kalrex** · (This post was last modified: 06-30-2013, 08:54 PM by Kalrex.)

We made an NAP A LONG time ago.
you make it sound as if we made an NAP and then the subsequent turn I launched an attack on Frost.

An NAP with you constitutes your hiding a patrol and sleeping/dispelling me turn after turn. That's questionable "non-aggression"

I did reiterate an NAP we have prior to attacking Frost, wonder why..., but you're saying that I initially asked for an NAP just the turn prior to attacking him>???

I attacked Wulfgar the same turn I attacked Frost-

I didn't encounter anyone else in Frosts Region except for you- So you're now saying Frost came under attack by 3 other positions in Region 10 that now magically vanished... sounds like you're making stuff up...

**Kalrex** · 06-30-2013, 08:56 PM

To be fair, UN also took my holdings in Region 10-

**Lord Diamond** · 06-30-2013, 09:13 PM

We agreed to a NAP on turn 12 and Frost Lord notified me within two turns that you were in the Southern Sands.

Frost Lord was already fighting the Gnome and the Underworld and the Ancient Ones attacked him about the same time you did. Throw in the Red, and he has five declared enemies.

I have taken no direct action against you. Your assuming I did doesn't make it so.

Why don't we disolve this NAP and make the rest of this game really interesting? I'm sure that I have plenty to learn from a foe as experienced as you. I probably should have attacked you first. Who knows how good I would be by now! I suggested it before, but you didn't respond.