Nature
Follow This Easy Process To Get Started Playing Alamaze
Step #1 - Register for Forum Account      Step #2 - Create New Player Account      Step #3 - Sign In  (to issue turn orders and join games)
ATTENTION: After Creating Player Account and Signing In, select the GAME QUEUE link in the Order System screen to Create or Join games.
Alamaze Website                 Search Forum              Contact Support@Alamaze.net


Player Aids             Rulebook             Spellbook             Help Guides             Kingdom Set-Ups             Kingdom Abbreviations             Valhalla             Discord

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Destroy Village and Destroy Town - potential issue?
#1
Folks,

I am wondering about the destroy town/village spells and their impact on emmisaries. According the desription, they are supposed to be "consumed in the flames" 50% of the time.

I have only two data points, but in both situations there were multiple AN consuls in the PC in question...and in both circumstances, they all escaped.

In 115, Mauler had 4 consuls in a PC in region 9; the SO destroyed this PC and all four escaped.

This past turn, something similar happened in another game (still in progress). 3 for 3 escaped.

There is a 0.0078125 chance of this happening...highly unsual at the very least.

I am wondering
(a) Does the consul ability to avoid capture apply to the Destroy PC spells?
(b) Have I interpreted the description of this spell incorrectly?
© Does the math above make sense given my understanding?

Thoughts and/or comments please.
Reply

#2
Consuls have fireproof underpants.
Reply

#3
I believer they refer to it as a "flame retardant codpiece."
-The Deliverer
Reply

#4
(02-13-2014, 08:11 PM)kevindusi Wrote: I believer they refer to it as a "flame retardant codpiece."
I know one person who could have used that:
http://www.virginmedia.com/music/feature...php?page=7
Reply

#5
(02-13-2014, 09:03 PM)DuPont Wrote:
(02-13-2014, 08:11 PM)kevindusi Wrote: I believer they refer to it as a "flame retardant codpiece."
I know one person who could have used that:
http://www.virginmedia.com/music/feature...php?page=7

Math looks good to me if held only to consuls. The WA did kill 50% of the non-consuls if that makes you feel better.

The only other game I have cast this spell in produced far less than 50% death rate as well. That did not involve consuls.
Reply

#6
(02-13-2014, 10:42 PM)Hawk_ Wrote:
(02-13-2014, 09:03 PM)DuPont Wrote:
(02-13-2014, 08:11 PM)kevindusi Wrote: I believer they refer to it as a "flame retardant codpiece."
I know one person who could have used that:
http://www.virginmedia.com/music/feature...php?page=7

Math looks good to me if held only to consuls. The WA did kill 50% of the non-consuls if that makes you feel better.

The only other game I have cast this spell in produced far less than 50% death rate as well. That did not involve consuls.

Hawk...I feel nothing but sadness for your non-consul nobles. Smile
Reply

#7
(02-13-2014, 11:04 PM)Wynand Wrote:
(02-13-2014, 10:42 PM)Hawk_ Wrote:
(02-13-2014, 09:03 PM)DuPont Wrote:
(02-13-2014, 08:11 PM)kevindusi Wrote: I believer they refer to it as a "flame retardant codpiece."
I know one person who could have used that:
http://www.virginmedia.com/music/feature...php?page=7

Math looks good to me if held only to consuls. The WA did kill 50% of the non-consuls if that makes you feel better.

The only other game I have cast this spell in produced far less than 50% death rate as well. That did not involve consuls.

Hawk...I feel nothing but sadness for your non-consul nobles. Smile

I was the SO in said game. I am very interested in the results of this conversation.
Reply



Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 Melroy van den Berg.