06-06-2014, 03:04 AM
Any chance in getting a new Cycle of Magic game going?
New Cycle of Magic Game?
|
06-06-2014, 03:04 AM
Any chance in getting a new Cycle of Magic game going?
06-06-2014, 05:26 AM
(06-06-2014, 03:04 AM)Helix Wrote: Any chance in getting a new Cycle of Magic game going? Anonymous would be great, you know except for knowing your team mates
Podium player returning to the conflict!
I think we could do that. And I really think having 4 per-determined alliances puts players on equal terms without having to make it anonymous.
So, sign up together or work it out, and let's get our Magic - which is four teams of three kingdoms going. We have a standard setup, but if players wish we can alter the kingdoms and alliances.
06-06-2014, 10:01 AM
I'm in for this..I suggest "LD drafting" for the alliances....so no one knows who is working together at the start. Also, I think exploratory is cool too...
Thoughts? LD, would help with the draft?
06-06-2014, 10:44 AM
I would love to try this format again. Count me in.
06-06-2014, 02:51 PM
I am new, but having a team sounds great. Count me in if that is ok. Perhaps a team setup that puts stronger and weaker players together would be possible?
"Have you ever considered piracy? You'd make a wonderful Dread Pirate Roberts."
06-06-2014, 02:55 PM
(06-06-2014, 10:01 AM)Wynand Wrote: I'm in for this..I suggest "LD drafting" for the alliances....so no one knows who is working together at the start. Also, I think exploratory is cool too... LD would be happy to manage the draft. The set teams has always been my biggest problem with the format. Followed closely by the fact that with 5 teams, it always seems to come down to 3 on 2. Lord Diamond
Please do not take any of my comments as a personal insult or as a criticism of the game 'Alamaze', which I very much enjoy. Rather, I hope that my personal insight and unique perspective may, in some way, help make 'Alamaze' more fun, a more successful financial venture, or simply more sustainable as a long-term project. Anyone who reads this post should feel completely free to ignore, disregard, scorn, implement, improve, dispute, or otherwise comment upon its content.
06-06-2014, 03:52 PM
I know one of the hang up is teammates dropping out? Could we be allowed to take over dropped teammate position or as DuPont suggested allow for standby to fill them far past the normal six turn limit?
I also think to allow the new guys a better chance to get with others maybe form up team here but not let others know kingdoms they are playing. I would have no problem with teaming up with Wyland and panda if they are willing to form a first team.
06-06-2014, 04:10 PM
So this will be a normal game, not Anonymous?
Podium player returning to the conflict!
06-06-2014, 04:24 PM
(This post was last modified: 06-06-2014, 04:26 PM by Jumpingfist.)
I am fine with anon or normal personally. But was thinking still anonymous just know the players involved not there team or kingdom. I think if someone wants to cheat and contact someone else in the game for plans is really not worth the risk of what they would go through on these forums should they get caught.
|
Users browsing this thread: |
2 Guest(s) |