Posts: 1,576
Threads: 77
Joined: Apr 2014
Reputation:
3
I think Baron's have some value (with the added cost to hire Governors) and I like the idea of taking adepts because you cannot get them anywhere else. General's have value too I think. Would be interested in hearing other people's strategies. Love that this has been added to the game.
-This Khal Drogo, it's said he has a hundred thousand men in his horde
Posts: 2,776
Threads: 70
Joined: Feb 2013
Reputation:
3
Depends on who I am playing, of course. I like Marshals, Adepts and Barons. In one game as a magic kingdom, I took two adepts, a power 1 and a baron.
I don't think I would take a general, even as a military kingdom. More likely two Marshals and an adept. I have taken the point of influence before, but never the gold. I'd like to see a HP among the rewards, though.
Posts: 1,576
Threads: 77
Joined: Apr 2014
Reputation:
3
Wouldn't two generals be worth more than a marshall?
-This Khal Drogo, it's said he has a hundred thousand men in his horde
Posts: 2,776
Threads: 70
Joined: Feb 2013
Reputation:
3
I don't think so because I find I want the immediate strength of the marshal and these days, it's a lot harder to get to Marshal than to General. Keep in mind, as a military kingdom, I'll probably be taking two marshals because I always go for the major reward.
Posts: 2,257
Threads: 228
Joined: Feb 2012
Reputation:
8
As the Elf, I chose a Duke, 2 Barons, and an Adept.
Lord Diamond
Please do not take any of my comments as a personal insult or as a criticism of the game 'Alamaze', which I very much enjoy. Rather, I hope that my personal insight and unique perspective may, in some way, help make 'Alamaze' more fun, a more successful financial venture, or simply more sustainable as a long-term project. Anyone who reads this post should feel completely free to ignore, disregard, scorn, implement, improve, dispute, or otherwise comment upon its content.
Buddy/Ignore List
