Posts: 389
Threads: 19
Joined: Mar 2015
Reputation:
0
I think majority of people agree that the week that is a 6 day turn around is a pain and you lose focus/interest that week. Maybe a 4/4/4 or 3/3/3?
Posts: 981
Threads: 33
Joined: Mar 2013
Reputation:
1
(06-12-2015, 07:33 AM)Sinestro Wrote: I think majority of people agree that the week that is a 6 day turn around is a pain and you lose focus/interest that week. Maybe a 4/4/4 or 3/3/3?
I vote for more options.
Posts: 445
Threads: 24
Joined: Jul 2014
Reputation:
4
I like all options. My only issue is seeing games I can not join pass me by due to my limits of how many games I can play.
Posts: 389
Threads: 19
Joined: Mar 2015
Reputation:
0
Posts: 2,257
Threads: 228
Joined: Feb 2012
Reputation:
8
All I want are more options. Really, that's all I ever want no matter the subject here. Give me as many options as is feasible and I am very happy.
Lord Diamond
Please do not take any of my comments as a personal insult or as a criticism of the game 'Alamaze', which I very much enjoy. Rather, I hope that my personal insight and unique perspective may, in some way, help make 'Alamaze' more fun, a more successful financial venture, or simply more sustainable as a long-term project. Anyone who reads this post should feel completely free to ignore, disregard, scorn, implement, improve, dispute, or otherwise comment upon its content.
Posts: 1,576
Threads: 77
Joined: Apr 2014
Reputation:
3
I would love a faster game. It's at the top of my wish list.
-This Khal Drogo, it's said he has a hundred thousand men in his horde
Posts: 53
Threads: 2
Joined: Feb 2015
Reputation:
0
Hello,
So, brand new here but I will add my perspective...
I actually ended up coming to Alamaze because of the paced turn-around. The older PBeM's I played had a turn once a week... (Not nearly as reliable as this game, by the way.)... which is why I came looking for a PBM.
Really, I only have time for one turn a week.
There have been times in my life where I couldn't get enough turns though... I think options are always better than less options. I would expect, if additional work needed to be done, people should pay for it.
So... I vote #2 although, I would probably not be using such an option.
Posts: 286
Threads: 5
Joined: Oct 2014
Reputation:
0
(06-11-2015, 03:49 PM)Cloud Wrote: I'm fine with the way things are but I'll vote for #1. More options is always better and money's not the issue. If I was price conscious, I wouldn't be playing this game at all! I mean, I could be eating hot dogs right now. I wonder if anyone's ever thought about the comparative price of a turn of Alamaze vs. buying a hot dog. I would be interested in hearing about that.
Cloud you do know what goes into a hot dog ... Don'y you?
I am the greatest swordsman that ever lived. Say, um, can I have some of that water?
Posts: 286
Threads: 5
Joined: Oct 2014
Reputation:
0
(06-11-2015, 04:37 PM)VballMichael Wrote: I am always in favor of more options, especially in light of the new automated processing.
I would pay more for faster turns, but like the optionality of choosing a faster game when appropriate.
I mostly play anon or team games, so faster is good. I agree with everything Vball wrote here.
And I would like to add how I would pay a LITTLE more for a faster Warlords turn around.
I am the greatest swordsman that ever lived. Say, um, can I have some of that water?
Posts: 1,968
Threads: 71
Joined: Jun 2013
Reputation:
6
So far:
#1 - HH, Sinestro, Cloud, LT, VBM, UM, JF, Hawk, Rogal, LD, Drogo, Madmardigan (12)
#2 - Feralkoala, Thudargh, manaleshi (3)
No vote - Frost Lord
|
Buddy/Ignore List
