Nature
Follow This Easy Process To Get Started Playing Alamaze
Step #1 - Register for Forum Account      Step #2 - Create New Player Account      Step #3 - Sign In  (to issue turn orders and join games)
ATTENTION: After Creating Player Account and Signing In, select the GAME QUEUE link in the Order System screen to Create or Join games.
Alamaze Website                 Search Forum              Contact Support@Alamaze.net


Player Aids             Rulebook             Spellbook             Help Guides             Kingdom Set-Ups             Kingdom Abbreviations             Valhalla             Discord

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
AN/DE Now Immune to Scandal Spell (381)
#21
(07-27-2015, 11:50 PM)HeadHoncho Wrote: Again, no critique was intended by any of this.  You're doing an amazing job.

I personally think this change makes sense, I just wanted people to be aware of it.

Honestly, I think if any change were to be made, it would be to give the AN the same courtesy.  But that is Ry Vor's call.  If 381 can conjure up something that could impact even the squeaky-clean AN, then down they go, I suppose.  With three or four Consul targets, that could become a major problem, but whatever works...

Having played the AN vs HH I was shocked to find out that scandal effected them and it is quite devastating.   Just moving your consuls doesn't help because the spell only requires kingdom and name.  That means you need to come up with 4 ward spells per turn to protect your consuls from Scandal.

I think the new version of the rules is better.
Reply

#22
I think that's probably right. AN and DE have always felt like different sides of the same coin, thematically (by deliberate design, I trust). I guess it feels a bit odd to me, to have DE be immune to 381 and not AN. Maybe this is one of those things that changed in NC? (The 381 affecting them, I mean.)
Reply



Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 Melroy van den Berg.