Alamaze - New

Full Version: The 2018 Alamaze Championship
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
RD please
(12-06-2018, 08:11 PM)VballMichael Wrote: [ -> ]We debate every year on exactly what should be the criteria and how we should pick. I have taken a stab at collecting some overall Steel game points and 2018 Steel game points and looked at podium finishes in 2018 and then came up with the following list in what I think is the draft order. I know the numbers are not exact, but are pretty close. I may have missed an active player, but certainly grabbed all with decent points. And you can disagree with a placement or two, but I think this is directionally sound. I think it needs to be a mix of overall points in Steel and 2018 points in Steel and a rough look at podium finishes. You will notice a very high correlation of overall points to 2018 points anyway. As for picking kingdoms, I like how we started. The top 10 should pick any kingdom they feel they have a claim to. Points or podium finishes in a kingdom should help drive that.

                                   Overall Steel points          2018 Steel points                2018 Podium finishes
1    Imperial Tark                 572,000                           132,000            1 - DA, 1 - DU, 1 - IL, 2 - DU, 2 - CI
2    DuPont                          417,000                          219,000             1 - WA, 2 - UN, 3 - SO, 3 - UN
3    Draugr                           407,000                          147,000             1 - AN, 1 - NE, 1 - GN, 2 - IL, 2 - GN, 3 - UN                     (incl. JF and JD for overall only)
4    Vball Michael                  398,000                          138,000             1 - SO, 1 - IL, 3 - DU
5    Canticar                         315,000                          122,000             1 - NE, 3 - DU, 3 - DA
6    Rellgar                           249,000                          143,000             1 - AN, 1 - SO, 2 - IL, 3 - IL
7    Acererak                        172,000                           115,000            1 - DE, 2 - EL, 2 - TY, 2 - GN, 2 - PI
8    Son of Conan                  172,000                           47,000             1 - NO, 3 - SO
9    Drogo                            154,000                           60,000             2 - WA, 2 - DA
10   Calidor                          87,000                            78,000              3 - DU, 3- SO
11   Eregnon the Black          61,000                            61,000              3 - DA
12   Strongwill                      67,000                            29,000              3 - RD
13   Gray Mouser                  30,000                            30,000
14   Tomag                          146,000                             4,445
15   Lojjin                            115,000                             1,386
16   Diamond Cutter             16,000                                   0

I'm a bit confused by this list.  I only finished 2 steel games in 2018 but I did have 32,000 points.  Not enough for the list?
Don't worry about it Wookie. As I was trying to figure out what kingdoms I qualify for, I was already eliminated from my first choices. Your welcome to any of my remaining choices. I give them to you.
Sorry Wookie. I was trying to figure out everyone still active. I missed you. That would put you around rank 12 or 13. You can follow the normal process that Draugr laid out. But no, you can't have Rellgar's picks, sorry.
Just to say I think this will work out, as it has in previous editions.  So I don't think I need to rule or anything, you guys are doing fine as the players determining how the Players Championship should work.  Good ideas.
I think we should go down 20 spots at least for who could potentially be in the Championship.  Some higher ranked are not active right now, like Tomag.

Acererak

How about we make it every 3 turns forum diplomacy? That was great and would be good pr for the game.

Acererak

I’ll take the DE.
(12-07-2018, 12:09 AM)Acererak Wrote: [ -> ]How about we make it every 3 turns forum diplomacy? That was great and would be good pr for the game.

Silent, as posted. Unfortunately, diplomacy leads to teaming and hurt feelings.

Acererak

(12-07-2018, 12:25 AM)VballMichael Wrote: [ -> ]
(12-07-2018, 12:09 AM)Acererak Wrote: [ -> ]How about we make it every 3 turns forum diplomacy? That was great and would be good pr for the game.

Silent, as posted. Unfortunately, diplomacy leads to teaming and hurt feelings.

Sure, that’s fine. I just have felt that as Rick has stated numerous times- the game is designed for diplomacy. I found the 3 turn forum diplomacy to be a good compromise where it doesn’t take too much time- but allowed for some extra strategy. Silent basically comes down to who invades their neighbor most effectively first. There are pluses and minuses to both.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9