Posts: 504
Threads: 5
Joined: Jan 2019
Reputation:
0
I am curious how or why this would happen.
In a game, I control Stormgate. There are no emmis there, no military there. In the regional reports, it says Stormgate is now uncontrolled. Then lower it says I lost influence for losing control of Stormgate, yet I still control it, I even recruited from it, and no one else is present at Stormgate?
How does this happen?
Ashgar the Bloodthirsty.
My blood, your blood, what difference does it make!
Time will tell.................
Posts: 1,303
Threads: 14
Joined: Jan 2018
Reputation:
2
(02-10-2020, 03:26 PM)Ashgar75 Wrote: I am curious how or why this would happen.
In a game, I control Stormgate. There are no emmis there, no military there. In the regional reports, it says Stormgate is now uncontrolled. Then lower it says I lost influence for losing control of Stormgate, yet I still control it, I even recruited from it, and no one else is present at Stormgate?
How does this happen?
Because you lowered the census by recruiting the village is now more than 40% of the regions census
Posts: 504
Threads: 5
Joined: Jan 2019
Reputation:
0
Les,
Thank you, Thank you. I get it now. Recruiting did it, then I cast spells raising production and census so I gained it back. Makes perfect sense now.
Ashgar the Bloodthirsty.
My blood, your blood, what difference does it make!
Time will tell.................
Related, but not Stormgate specific. I had a division in ambush at a city, I was not attacked and thus did not retreat but an opposing army still took my city. That doesn’t seem right to me?
Posts: 1,303
Threads: 14
Joined: Jan 2018
Reputation:
2
If they cannot see you then your not blocking them. Works same way for moving emmies past an invis or ambushing group
Posts: 1,733
Threads: 14
Joined: Jan 2019
Reputation:
1
(02-10-2020, 04:16 PM)Acererak Wrote: Related, but not Stormgate specific. I had a division in ambush at a city, I was not attacked and thus did not retreat but an opposing army still took my city. That doesn’t seem right to me?
Why were you hiding?
Posts: 2,605
Threads: 78
Joined: Aug 2016
Reputation:
57
(02-10-2020, 04:48 PM)The Painted Man Wrote: (02-10-2020, 04:16 PM)Acererak Wrote: Related, but not Stormgate specific. I had a division in ambush at a city, I was not attacked and thus did not retreat but an opposing army still took my city. That doesn’t seem right to me?
Why were you hiding?
He likely learned it from you, Painted One 
Posts: 1,733
Threads: 14
Joined: Jan 2019
Reputation:
1
(02-10-2020, 04:52 PM)Wookie Panz Wrote: (02-10-2020, 04:48 PM)The Painted Man Wrote: (02-10-2020, 04:16 PM)Acererak Wrote: Related, but not Stormgate specific. I had a division in ambush at a city, I was not attacked and thus did not retreat but an opposing army still took my city. That doesn’t seem right to me?
Why were you hiding?
He likely learned it from you, Painted One
We all know that is all that I do. What I want to know is why HE was doing it.
Posts: 2,500
Threads: 45
Joined: Aug 2017
Reputation:
30
(02-10-2020, 04:54 PM)The Painted Man Wrote: (02-10-2020, 04:52 PM)Wookie Panz Wrote: (02-10-2020, 04:48 PM)The Painted Man Wrote: (02-10-2020, 04:16 PM)Acererak Wrote: Related, but not Stormgate specific. I had a division in ambush at a city, I was not attacked and thus did not retreat but an opposing army still took my city. That doesn’t seem right to me?
Why were you hiding?
He likely learned it from you, Painted One
We all know that is all that I do. What I want to know is why HE was doing it.
He was waiting in ambush= hidden
Posts: 1,733
Threads: 14
Joined: Jan 2019
Reputation:
1
(02-10-2020, 05:16 PM)PTRILEY Wrote: He was waiting in ambush= hidden
But then he did not ambush.
|
Buddy/Ignore List
