Posts: 2,776
Threads: 70
Joined: Feb 2013
Reputation:
3
I think for me, I will no longer be using my own maps. I actually used Photoshop. I had the map with the borders and I have a layer for each game I play. This map does everything I was doing on mine (more, actually, because I usually did not bother to plot group locations). The only flaw I have found so far is when an artifact is removed, the space shows as unexplored. That's really the only fly in the ointment and I imagine it can be fixed without much problem.
As for diplomacy, I am aware this is a diplomacy game, but I've done zero of that. I'm not really trying to win or anything, just testing out the map.
Posts: 185
Threads: 6
Joined: Feb 2018
Reputation:
0
Looks like some of you are trying to lose. Good! Who is trying to win? I am learning this game I need a challenge .
Posts: 1,850
Threads: 44
Joined: Aug 2016
Reputation:
20
Im trying to win, come and take me out.
Posts: 1,303
Threads: 14
Joined: Jan 2018
Reputation:
2
I have found a problem (G5143) that the artifact type is displayed on the Map but does not share the same information on the turn. Using a lvl 4 agent to explore tell you an artifact is in an area but not the type. The MAP tells you the type which I understand is intended.
I do not like that I am required to use the map. I would like all information available on the turn so I can plot it from the turn to my own map that provides me the flexibility to do what I feel is needed on my map.
Posts: 1,850
Threads: 44
Joined: Aug 2016
Reputation:
20
Check out the graphics when a meteor strike is cast.
Can you change the reconned PCs to show the ownership every turn according to the last known recon?