Login

**Rogal** · 10-04-2016, 09:02 PM

(PI) The RA current issue marks the point where everyone has had one issue put up.

**Wookie Panz** · 10-04-2016, 10:24 PM

(10-04-2016, 09:02 PM)Rogal Wrote: (PI) The RA current issue marks the point where everyone has had one issue put up.

(RA) I think we have heard from everyone except the NO on this. Lord Acererak where do you stand on this? I think SA wants to go back to high bid, GN wants to continue rotation, PI and RA can go either way.

**Devildog** · 10-04-2016, 11:00 PM

(10-04-2016, 09:02 PM)Rogal Wrote: (PI) The RA current issue marks the point where everyone has had one issue put up.

Not exactly. There was an agreement that each member would get a turn with no interference from the others in a specified sequence. Three members have had a turn. There are 2 left to go. After that time if we want to resume open bidding then I have no objection. It should be the pirates turn now.

10-05-2016, 01:33 AM

(NO) I'm good with PI then GN getting a whirl unopposed, and after that it's time to bid.

NO-RA : Shall we extend our NAP until turn 20?

**Rogal** · 10-05-2016, 02:58 AM

(PI) Sounds good to me, working in my turn tonight, so I hope everyone is in agreement, for it seems like it is, but we pirates tend to miss things from time to time.

**Wookie Panz** · 10-05-2016, 10:33 AM

(10-05-2016, 01:33 AM)Acererak Wrote: (NO) I'm good with PI then GN getting a whirl unopposed, and after that it's time to bid.

NO-RA : Shall we extend our NAP until turn 20?

(RA) Agreed to NAP until or through turn 20. In fact, we can go till game end if you like as you have proven trustworthy.

Also agree to PI, then GN on High Counsel then open bidding.

10-05-2016, 04:38 PM

(NO) 20 is good, with 2 turn notification of intent to withdraw. Game long doesn't make sense as it's conceivable I might have to reluctantly intervene if you are close to winning.

10-05-2016, 04:39 PM

(NO)

NO-LI- I'd like to secure my northern border longer than the current turn 12. How about turn 18 or even 20 with 2 turn notification of intent to withdraw?

**Wookie Panz** · 10-05-2016, 05:18 PM

(RA) LI - Uncle Mike, I would like to extend our NAP to at least turn 18 but longer if you agree. I'd welcome an upgrade to a mutual defense pact if you are interested.

**unclemike** · 10-05-2016, 07:03 PM

(10-05-2016, 04:39 PM)Acererak Wrote: (NO)

NO-LI- I'd like to secure my northern border longer than the current turn 12. How about turn 18 or even 20 with 2 turn notification of intent to withdraw?

LI

Ok