(10-05-2016, 10:33 AM)Wookie Panz Wrote: (10-05-2016, 01:33 AM)Acererak Wrote: (NO) I'm good with PI then GN getting a whirl unopposed, and after that it's time to bid.
NO-RA : Shall we extend our NAP until turn 20?
(RA) Agreed to NAP until or through turn 20. In fact, we can go till game end if you like as you have proven trustworthy.
Also agree to PI, then GN on High Counsel then open bidding.
(10-06-2016, 08:04 PM)Wookie Panz Wrote: (10-06-2016, 05:33 PM)RELLGAR Wrote: SA-NO Lord of the sands, it's nice for you to visit our kingdom, some notice of your arrival next time would be encouraged. I surmise that there is no non aggression treaty between us, what are your intensions? Would you like to exchange ambassadors now?
RELLGAR The Great
SA-RA Good friend Sir Ranger, it appears we may soon need your assistance. I believe a 2 turn warning of intent to dissolve your NAP with the Nomad is honorable, should it be necessary.
RELLGAR
(RA) - NO, and SA It appears my diplomacy puts me in the middle of a potential conflict. I have a long term NAP with NO and a long term Mutual Defense Pact with SA.
No, might it be possible to turn your attentions elsewhere? GN could certainly use some major help and TY has most of Runnimede. I've a NAP with both of them that will soon be over.
NO- Not sure what the SA is talking about. We are but a poor desert folk, unskilled in the ways of war. Theoretically however, I do believe our NAP was in force prior to and continually since your pact with the
SA. I assume you will honor that agreement first. You are of course welcome to give me two turn warning of intent to withdraw and commence hostile action against me on the third turn if you wish. That is your choice. I prefer to keep our agreement.
(10-06-2016, 05:33 PM)RELLGAR Wrote: SA-NO Lord of the sands, it's nice for you to visit our kingdom, some notice of your arrival next time would be encouraged. I surmise that there is no non aggression treaty between us, what are your intensions? Would you like to exchange ambassadors now?
RELLGAR The Great
SA-RA Good friend Sir Ranger, it appears we may soon need your assistance. I believe a 2 turn warning of intent to dissolve your NAP with the Nomad is honorable, should it be necessary.
RELLGAR
NO- Fair Rellgar, we are very thirsty now that summer has arrived and your area has the sweetest water. Surely you understand our desire to quench our thirst. Make me an offer, everything is negotiable.
Posts: 1,850
Threads: 44
Joined: Aug 2016
Reputation:
20
(10-06-2016, 09:21 PM)Acererak Wrote: (10-06-2016, 05:33 PM)RELLGAR Wrote: SA-NO Lord of the sands, it's nice for you to visit our kingdom, some notice of your arrival next time would be encouraged. I surmise that there is no non aggression treaty between us, what are your intensions? Would you like to exchange ambassadors now?
RELLGAR The Great
SA-RA Good friend Sir Ranger, it appears we may soon need your assistance. I believe a 2 turn warning of intent to dissolve your NAP with the Nomad is honorable, should it be necessary.
RELLGAR
NO- Fair Rellgar, we are very thirsty now that summer has arrived and your area has the sweetest water. Surely you understand our desire to quench our thirst. Make me an offer, everything is negotiable.
SA- MY sandy friend, you tell me what it is that will quench your thirst without causing you to lose your head? You think my military is entirely in Torvale? Perhaps you have miscalculated? You did assist me earlier in me taking the village to gain control of Amberland and was compensated with another village, So I will now help you with something reasonable. Let's come to some agreement so we can not cause our mutual friend The Ranger any grief.
RELLGAR The Great
Posts: 2,610
Threads: 78
Joined: Aug 2016
Reputation:
57
(RA) to NO and SA
Friends, why don't you exchange another village, which will aid you both in your seasons of famine. I would hate to have to choose which one of you to support as you have both been steadfast friends.
Posts: 2,610
Threads: 78
Joined: Aug 2016
Reputation:
57
(10-06-2016, 11:44 PM)Wookie Panz Wrote: (RA) to NO and SA
Friends, why don't you exchange another village, which will aid you both in your seasons of famine. I would hate to have to choose which one of you to support as you have both been steadfast friends.
(RA) NO - Nomad friend, if I am forced to chose between our NAP and the MDP with SA I will have to chose the stronger agreement. I truly hope I am not forced to make that decision. I'm very content with the desert dwellers and would like to stay that way. Your favorite season approaches!
Wookie PANZ
Posts: 350
Threads: 16
Joined: Jul 2015
Reputation:
1
WA -> All our neighbors
Greeting Lords and Ladies,
We have been somewhat distracted by our research in the Flaming Tower of Wizardly Stuff.
But just in case the generals are getting restless, we would like to extend any existing NAPs to 20 turns with our neighbors. Please respond back with your acceptance.
Red
Posts: 311
Threads: 10
Joined: Mar 2016
Reputation:
0
(10-07-2016, 10:28 AM)Wookie Panz Wrote: (10-06-2016, 11:44 PM)Wookie Panz Wrote: (RA) to NO and SA
Friends, why don't you exchange another village, which will aid you both in your seasons of famine. I would hate to have to choose which one of you to support as you have both been steadfast friends.
(RA) NO - Nomad friend, if I am forced to chose between our NAP and the MDP with SA I will have to chose the stronger agreement. I truly hope I am not forced to make that decision. I'm very content with the desert dwellers and would like to stay that way. Your favorite season approaches!
Wookie PANZ
(NO)
NO- RA . That choice is yours of course. I will be forced if this does happen to invoke my pact with the Red Wizard of the mountains if you engage me.
NO- SA. Here's my offer: I take your sea holdings and leave the rest alone. Apparently you are gaining in Torvale so you have plenty to share. In return I would agree to an NAP. If you decline I'll take all of that and more. I'm not concerned about your military bc I kept my troops at home, where we have absolute Supremacy in the sands. Bring your troops down- I'll be happy to fight them in the desert after you move for 5 turns.
NO-WA . Great friend. I hope you won't have to intervene in the next few turns against the Ranger but if he decides to attack me I'll be happy to divine his pop centers and share with you. I know distance is nothing to the great Warlock. I remain, your steadfast friend.
Posts: 536
Threads: 14
Joined: Jul 2016
Reputation:
0
NE > WA
Great Red Wizard
Naps, Mutual Defense Agreements do these allow the NO to move through a napping neighbor to attack a foe over a simple village in the sea and an Ambasador.
I am glad to renew OUR nap.
I can see the RA fighting for his MDP the SA in Amberland against any foe that threatens there, but I must hold both the NO and RA is the lowest regard if Either breaks their previously agreed upon NAP. This giving of a notice of 2 turns is the same as a declaration of war. We may be The Death Eater's, but do hold HONOR high.
Posts: 536
Threads: 14
Joined: Jul 2016
Reputation:
0
NE > DU
Great Centaur we have peace through I believe Mid Summer. I would extend that trough at least Turn 20.
I may be forced to intervene in the South over a question of honor. To this point I believe all have acted honorably, even the TY. He announced his demands on the GN, and then secured his back with agreements with the SA and RA, and acted as he foretold. The GN has asked all others to avoid conflict in Runnimede, and I as far as I know all have complied. The Ty has too much potential to allow free reign outside 1 region. His agrement with the SA allowed him Avalon. I feel too much income equals too much power to recruit for the TY.
|
Buddy/Ignore List
